I'm unsure if this really captures the left/right divide all that well. It does capture strong currents within both - namely the progressive strain of leftism and the conservative or reactionary strain of rightism, but there are plenty of examples of both leftists wanting to turn back the clock and rightists wanting to change society.
An example of the former is how many leftists want to reverse economic liberalisation efforts undertaken in the 1970s and 1980s. e.g. through strengthening unions and anti-monopoly regulation, reversing various welfare reforms e.g. means testing, or re-nationalising certain industries. On the latter, rightists were often the first to introduce economic liberalisation in the first place - for example the Goods and Services Tax was introduced in Australia by the right amidst fierce opposition from the left.
Good essay, though it seems to imply that all societies are generally shaped by this dance between left and right when that isn't necessarily the case. In many emerging nations for example where the national identity is only weakly established and ethnic conflicts predominate, it's arguable whether there even is anything readily identifiable as a left-right divide.
Good general summary. The great axes of society are not right and wrong, but chaos and order. If you were going into more detail, I'd go over the various axes. There's social, and economic. And there's also different flavors of left; some want to change, others to deconstruct.
I'm unsure if this really captures the left/right divide all that well. It does capture strong currents within both - namely the progressive strain of leftism and the conservative or reactionary strain of rightism, but there are plenty of examples of both leftists wanting to turn back the clock and rightists wanting to change society.
An example of the former is how many leftists want to reverse economic liberalisation efforts undertaken in the 1970s and 1980s. e.g. through strengthening unions and anti-monopoly regulation, reversing various welfare reforms e.g. means testing, or re-nationalising certain industries. On the latter, rightists were often the first to introduce economic liberalisation in the first place - for example the Goods and Services Tax was introduced in Australia by the right amidst fierce opposition from the left.
Good essay, though it seems to imply that all societies are generally shaped by this dance between left and right when that isn't necessarily the case. In many emerging nations for example where the national identity is only weakly established and ethnic conflicts predominate, it's arguable whether there even is anything readily identifiable as a left-right divide.
Good general summary. The great axes of society are not right and wrong, but chaos and order. If you were going into more detail, I'd go over the various axes. There's social, and economic. And there's also different flavors of left; some want to change, others to deconstruct.
Please explain why the big cities and both coasts are more liberal than the rest of the country